Smith v. Pepsi Bottling Group
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
WESLEY EDWARD SMITH, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP, INCORPORATED, PBG, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Robert S. Carr, Magistrate Judge. (2:06-cv-00040)
February 27, 2008
March 26, 2008
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wesley Edward Smith, III, Appellant Pro Se. Ashley Bryan Abel, Jody M. Smitherman, JACKSON & LEWIS, LLP, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Wesley Edward Smith, III, appeals the magistrate judge's order dismissing his employment discrimination claims and granting summary judgment in favor of Pepsi Bottling Group on their
counterclaim for conversion.*
We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Smith v. Pepsi Bottling Group, No. Additionally, we deny
2:06-cv-00040 (D.S.C. Aug. 31, 2007).
Smith's motions for issuance of subpoenas and for preparation of transcripts at government expense. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
This case was decided by a magistrate judge with the parties' consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2002). - 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?