Stephen Bruns v. John Potter
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
STEPHEN E. BRUNS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:06-cv-01076-JFM)
December 16, 2008
January 8, 2009
Before NIEMEYER and Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas James Gagliardo, THE GAGLIARDO LAW FIRM, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Ariana Wright Arnold, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Stephen E. Bruns appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant on Bruns' claim of retaliation, in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See
Bruns v. Potter, No. 1:06-cv-01076-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 22, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?