Stephen Bruns v. John Potter

Filing 920090108

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-2125

STEPHEN E. BRUNS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:06-cv-01076-JFM)

Submitted:

December 16, 2008

Decided:

January 8, 2009

Before NIEMEYER and Senior Circuit Judge.

MICHAEL,

Circuit

Judges,

and

HAMILTON,

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas James Gagliardo, THE GAGLIARDO LAW FIRM, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Ariana Wright Arnold, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Stephen E. Bruns appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant on Bruns' claim of retaliation, in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See

Bruns v. Potter, No. 1:06-cv-01076-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 22, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2