Connie Laishley v. Michael Astrue
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
CONNIE J. LAISHLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Maurice G. Taylor, Jr., Magistrate Judge. (3:05-cv-00714)
April 30, 2008
July 21, 2008
Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Connie J. Laishley, Appellant Pro Se. Heather Benderson, Michael McGaughran, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Kelly Rixner Curry, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Connie J. Laishley appeals the magistrate judge's order affirming the Commissioner's denial of disability insurance
benefits and supplemental security income.* decision to deny benefits if the
We must uphold the is supported by
substantial evidence and the correct law was applied.
U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir. 1996). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Laishley v. Astrue, No. 3:05-cv-00714 (S.D. W. Va. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
Sept. 4, 2007).
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?