Thurston Bell v. US
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-2208
THURSTON PAUL BELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; WALTER MATYCZYK, JR.; LEON K, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:06-cv-03406-WDQ) Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 28, 2008
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thurston Paul Bell, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth L. Greene, Richard T. Morrison, Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, Gretchen M. Wolfinger, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Thurston Paul Bell appeals from the district court's orders: (1) denying his petition to quash a third-party recordkeeper summons issued by the Internal Revenue Service, (2) ordering enforcement of the summons, (3) denying his motions to disqualify the district court judge, and (4) denying his motion for the court to invalidate a judgment of a district court in Pennsylvania. We
have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no abuse of discretion and no clear error. Accordingly, we affirm Bell v. United
for the reasons stated by the district court.
States, No. 1-06-cv-03406-WDQ (D. Md. filed July 11, 2007; entered July 13, 2007 & October 2, 2007). We deny the United States'
motion for sanctions, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?