US v. Daniel Liptak
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DANIEL LIPTAK, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:07-cr-00009-gec)
March 31, 2008
May 28, 2008
Before MICHAEL and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry W. Shelton, Federal Public Defender, Randy V. Cargill, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Jean B. Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Daniel modifying the Liptak of appeals his the district release court's to order a
requirement that he participate in a sex offender assessment and treatment deemed necessary as a result of the assessment. A
district court's imposition of special conditions of supervised release is reviewed for abuse of discretion. Dotson, 324 F.3d 256, 259 (4th Cir. 2003). United States v.
We have reviewed the
record and conclude that the decision to modify the terms of Liptak's release was a proper exercise of discretion. Accordingly, we grant the motion for leave to file a supplemental brief and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Liptak, No. 7:07-cr-00009-gec (W.D. Va. June 20, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?