Harris v. City of Raleigh
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JAMES EDWARD HARRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CITY OF RALEIGH; RALEIGH CHIEF OF POLICE; OFFICER MADDOCK; OFFICER DUFAULT; OFFICER J.W. BISHOP; OFFICER S. M. HOOLAN; OFFICER D. B. KILGORE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (5:06-cv-00496-D)
July 25, 2007
August 2, 2007
Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Edward Harris, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: James Edward Harris appeals the district court's orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harris v. City of Raleigh, No. 5:06-cv-00496-D
(E.D.N.C. Dec. 4, 2006; Jan. 3, 2007).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?