In Re: Harris v.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL A. HARRIS, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (No. 5:05-cv-00092-FPS)
April 19, 2007
April 25, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael A. Harris, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Michael A. Harris petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this court Our review of the docket
directing the district court to act.
sheet reveals that the magistrate judge filed on March 9, 2007, a recommendation that the § 2241 petition be denied. Accordingly,
because significant action has recently occurred in this case, we deny the mandamus petition. forma pauperis. We grant Harris' motion to proceed in
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?