In Re: Meshaw v.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
DANNY EUGENE MESHAW, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (7:04-cr-00061-F-3;7:06-cv-00006)
August 22, 2007
August 29, 2007
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Danny Eugene Meshaw, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Danny Eugene Meshaw petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed in acting on his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). Meshaw seeks an Our
order from this court directing the district court to act.
review of the record indicates that the district court denied Meshaw's § 2255 motion by order dated June 19, 2007. See Meshaw v.
United States, Nos. 7:04-cr-00061-F-3; 7:06-cv-00006-F (E.D.N.C. June 18, 2007). Accordingly, because the district court has acted We
in Meshaw's case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot.
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?