Huff v. Baskerville
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JOHNNY R. HUFF, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus A. BASKERVILLE, Warden; S. DAWKINS, Treatment Program Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate Judge. (3:06-cv-00147-MHL)
August 27, 2007
September 12, 2007
Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Johnny R. Huff, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Johnny R. Huff appeals the magistrate judge's* order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have
Accordingly, we Huff v. We
affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge.
Baskerville, No. 3:06-cv-00147-MHL (E.D. Va. Jan. 24, 2007).
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). - 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?