In re: Watkins v.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
DEJUAN ANDERKO WATKINS,
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (7:02-cr-00106-F; 7:05-cv-00019-F)
April 20, 2007
April 30, 2007
Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dejuan Anderko Watkins, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Dejuan Anderko Watkins petitions for a writ of mandamus claiming there was undue delay by the district court in disposing of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The Government filed a
response noting that the district court entered a judgment and order denying the § 2255 motion. In light of the court's action, We
we deny as moot Watkins' petition for a writ of mandamus.
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?