Jackson v. Hooper
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
GARY JACKSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DARRELL HOOPER, Welding Instructor; PIEDMONT COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Defendants - Appellees, and MRS. OWENS, Vocational CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Programmer; CASWELL Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Wallace W. Dixon, Magistrate Judge. (1:05-cv-00096-WWD)
September 5, 2007
September 13, 2007
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Alan S. Hicks, ALAN S. HICKS, P.A., Roxboro, North Carolina; Yvonne Bullock Ricci, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM: Gary Jackson appeals the magistrate judge's* order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we Jackson v. 2007). We
affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Hooper, No. 1:05-cv-00096-WWD (M.D.N.C. Jan. 25,
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2007). - 3 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?