Inko-Tariah v. Lappin

Filing 920091007

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6242 CHARLES A. INKO-TARIAH, Plaintiff Appellant, v. HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons; ART F. BEELER, Warden, Federal Medical Center, Butner; MONA HORTON, Supervisor of Education, Federal Medical Center, Butner; MARY ELLIS, Director of Nursing, Federal Medical Center, Butner, Defendants Appellees. No. 09-6889 CHARLES A. INKO-TARIAH, Plaintiff Appellant, v. HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons; ART F. BEELER, Warden, Federal Medical Center, Butner; MONA HORTON, Supervisor of Education, Federal Medical Center, Butner; MARY ELLIS, Director of Nursing, Federal Medical Center, Butner; BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendants Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:05-ct-00585-H) Submitted: September 8, 2009 Decided: October 7, 2009 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles A. Inko-Tariah, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Charles A. Inko-Tariah appeals the dismissal of his complaint alleging violations of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. 12131, et seq., Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 794, Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and North Carolina's Handicapped Persons Protection Act, N.C.G.S. 168A-1, et seq. record and find no reversible error. the reasons No. stated by the district (E.D.N.C. 30, We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for court. filed Inko-Tariah Apr. 6, 2006 v. & We legal Lappin, entered dispense 5:05-ct-00585-H 2006; Jan. Apr. 10, with 2007; Apr. 1, the facts 2009). and oral argument because contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?