Harley v. Bradford
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
STANLEY HARLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KENNETH BRADFORD; DONALD KITT; BERNARD WALKER; VIOLA BLACK; JOHN DELOACH; VALERIE JONES; SHIRLEY S. MARACHESI; GEORGE T. HAGAN; CARL J. FREDERICK; UNIDENTIFIED INDIVIDUALS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (6:06-cv-01852-GRA)
Submitted: June 21, 2007
June 28, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanley Harley, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Hodges Waldron, Jr., Keely Mikhael McComb McCoy, CAROLINA LITIGATION ASSOCIATES, LLC, Bluffton, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Stanley Harley appeals the district court's order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm Harley v. Bradford,
for the reasons stated by the district court.
No. 6:06-cv-01852-GRA (D.S.C. Feb. 5, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?