In Re: Deleston v.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
In Re: DWAYNE DELESTON, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:02-cv-03895-DCN)
Submitted: July 24, 2007
July 30, 2007
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dwayne Deleston, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Dwayne Deleston petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on his motion to amend a prior 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. relief. Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Further, mandamus is a used in extraordinary We conclude that Deleston is not entitled to mandamus
Ass'n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). drastic remedy and should only be
Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394,
402 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). The relief sought by Deleston is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant Deleston's motion to
proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?