Young v. Nickols
Filing
920071031
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6475
ROBERT E. YOUNG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NEIL COLLIER, Probation Officer; CHRISTOPHER BARDON, Probation Officer, Defendants - Appellees, and RON NICKOLS, Sheriff; OFFICER BUCHEAUN; GAY; UNKNOWN OFFICERS, NETTER; Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (6:03-cv-3640)
Submitted:
October 10, 2007
Decided:
October 31, 2007
Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert E. Young, Appellant Pro Se. Teresa A. Knox, Tommy Evans, Jr., John Benjamin Aplin, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE & PARDON SERVICE, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM: Robert E. Young appeals the district court's order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying reconsideration of that order. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons See Young v. Collier, No. 6:03-cvFurther, we deny We dispense with contentions are
stated by the district court.
3640 (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2006 & Mar. 23, 2007). Young's motion for the appointment of counsel. oral argument because the facts and legal
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?