Lunsford v. LaManna
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JOHN WAYNE LUNSFORD, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOHN J. LAMANNA, Warden of FCI-Edgefield; UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (9:06-cv-02395-JFA)
September 26, 2007
October 4, 2007
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Wayne Lunsford, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: John Wayne Lunsford seeks to challenge on appeal the authority of a United States magistrate judge to conduct a motion hearing. The underlying case in which the hearing was scheduled
remains pending in the district court. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The
proceeding Lunsford seeks to challenge reflects neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we deny Lunsford's motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. oral argument because the facts and legal We dispense with contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?