Blount v. Williams
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
DONELL J. BLOUNT, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOCTOR WILLIAMS; D. YATES, R.N.; P. ADAMS, L.P.N.; C. MORE, L.P.N.; V. PHIPPS; LIEUTENANT MULLINS; SERGEANT DAY; LIEUTENANT ROSE; CORPORAL MCCLEAN; CORPORAL FIELDS; R. MULLINS; CORPORAL LYALL; CORPORAL BAKER; LIEUTENANT TURNER; J. ARMENTROUT; SERGEANT TATE; CORPORAL LAWSON; CORPORAL BOYD; CORPORAL JEREMY FLEMING; CORRECTIONS OFFICER SMITH; CORRECTIONS OFFICER RATLIFF; SERGEANT O'QUINN; OFFICER FOSTER; OFFICER PENNINGTON; J. FLEMING; LIEUTENANT S. MULLINS; S. BOYD; M. MCCLELLAN, Defendants - Appellees, and CORPORAL OWENS; CORPORAL TOMKINS; CORPORAL KENNEDY; CORPORAL LEE; SERGEANT MULLINS; WARDEN T. RAY; DOCTOR BAILEY, Dentist; Y. TAYLOR; R. N. ROBERTS; CORPORAL EDWARD; CORPORAL TAYLOR; CORPORAL BUCHANAN; SERGEANT PHILLIPS; CORPORAL GREG BOYD; CORPORAL LAMBERT; GENE M. JOHNSON; JANE DOE; JOHN DOE, Defendants.
DONELL J. BLOUNT, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GENTRY, Correctional Officer; SEXTON, Correctional Officer; DOCTOR WILLIAMS; V. PHIPPS, Nurse; T. RAY, Warden; LARRY HUFFMAN, Regional Director; JOHN DOE; NURSE MULLINS; YATES, Registered Nurse; FLEMING; ANDERSON, Correctional Officer; COX, Correctional Officer; RASNICK, Correctional Officer; C/O MULLINS; SERGEANT FLEMING; J. FLEMING, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:05-cv-00556-GEC; 7:06-cv-00312)
October 5, 2007
November 1, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donell J. Blount, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Jim Harold Guynn, Jr., GUYNN, MEMMER & DILLON, PC, Roanoke, Virginia; Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Donell J. Blount, Sr., appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaints. reversible error. We have reviewed the records and find no
Accordingly, we affirm both orders for the See Blount v. Williams, No.
reasons stated by the district court.
7:05-cv-00556-GEC (W.D. Va. filed Mar. 23, 2007 & entered Mar. 26, 2007); Blount v. Gentry, No. 7:06-cv-00312 (W.D. Va. filed May 2, 2007 & entered May 3, 2007). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 3 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?