US v. Swann
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WILLIE SWANN, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:90-cr-00166-JFM)
March 14, 2008
March 31, 2008
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Swann, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Willie Swann appeals the district court's order denying his request for mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re
First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court,
426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Our review discloses no error in the district court's
decision denying Swann's request for mandamus relief. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Swann, No. We dispense with oral
1:90-cr-00166-JFM (D. Md. Apr. 24, 2007).
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?