Short v. Smith
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
HARVEY P. SHORT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN DOE; PRESSIE BOYKIN, Probation Agent; AUDREY E. MELBOURNE; WHITE, Assistant State Attorney; JAY CREECH, Assistant State's Attorney; PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY GOVERNMENT; GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND; WARDEN SMITH; RICHARD A. LANHAM, JR.; SECRETARY OF PUBLIC SAFETY, and Correctional Services; WILLIAM D. MISSOURI; WILLIAM H. MCCULLOUGH; ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR.; PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOHN DOE, State Trooper #1; JOHN DOE, State Trooper #2; WILLIAM DONALD SHAFFER, Governor; PARRIS N. GLENDENING, Governor; BISHOP L. ROBINSON; JANE DOE, Commitment Office Manager; US AIR GROUP, INCORPORATED; SHERIFF PENDERGRASS; CAPTAIN HARVEY; PATUXENT INSTITUTION, Superintendent; MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL TRAINING CENTER, Warden; MARYLAND RECEPTION, DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION INSTITUTE; SUPER FRESH FOOD MARKETS OF MARYLAND, INCORPORATED; 7-ELEVEN, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:06-cv-02217-DKC)
October 18, 2007
October 25, 2007
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harvey P. Short, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM: Harvey P. Short appeals the district court's order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we Short v. Doe,
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. No. 8:06-cv-02217-DKC (D. Md. June 26, 2007). oral argument because the facts and legal
We dispense with contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 3 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?