US v. Hicks
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MICHAEL HICKS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:99-cr-00445-CMH)
December 20, 2007
December 27, 2007
Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Hicks, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Whitmarsh Drew, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Michael Hicks appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of his criminal conviction for assaulting a correctional officer. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Hicks, No. 1:99-cr00445-CMH (E.D. Va. June 27, 2007). and dispense with oral argument We deny Hicks' motion for stay because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?