In Re: Chavis v.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
In Re: HERBERT CHAVIS, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
November 28, 2007
December 17, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Herbert Chavis, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Herbert Chavis petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling the district court to vacate his 1997 state court convictions and remand to the trial court for a new trial. We conclude that Chavis is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Further, mandamus is a only in extraordinary
Ass'n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). drastic remedy and should be used
Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394,
402 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus relief is available only where there is no other available remedy. 2001). In re Braxton, 258 F.3d 250, 261 (4th Cir.
Here, Chavis had other means of obtaining relief; namely, Therefore, the
through a collateral attack on his conviction.
relief sought by Chavis is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?