In Re: Dinsio v.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
In Re: AMIL DINSIO,
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:92-cr-00155-FDW)
October 18, 2007
October 26, 2007
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Amil Alfred Dinsio, Sr., James F. Dinsio, Petitioners Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Amil Alfred Dinsio, Sr., and James F. Dinsio petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to recall the detainer lodged against them for a supervised release violation. relief. Mandamus relief is available only when a petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Further, mandamus is a used in extraordinary We conclude that they are not entitled to mandamus
Ass'n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). drastic remedy and should only be
Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394,
402 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). The relief sought by Amil and James Dinsio is not
available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?