Mullins v. US
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
RONNIE MULLINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; RICHARD RAMIREZ; E. MACE; MARK DIB; SALVATORE LANASE; KAREN LAMBRIGHT; JANET BUNTS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (1:06-cv-00105)
January 17, 2008
January 25, 2008
Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronnie Mullins, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia; William Eugene Galeota, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Ronnie Mullins appeals the district court's order
adopting the report of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Mullins' complaint asserting deliberate indifference to medical needs and medical negligence pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2000). have reviewed the record and find no reversible We
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mullins v. United States, No. 1:06-cv-00105 (N.D.W. Va. We deny Mullins' motion for leave to proceed on We dispense with oral argument because
Aug. 30, 2007).
appeal in forma pauperis.
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?