Belk v. Dickerhoff

Filing 920080417

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7363

RONNIE M. BELK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER DICKERHOFF, Defendant - Appellee, and SUPERINTENDENT SORRELL SAUNDERS; ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT RANDY TURNER; SERGEANT MCNEIL, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-ct-03071-H)

Submitted:

March 20, 2008

Decided:

April 17, 2008

Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie M. Belk, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM: Ronnie M. Belk appeals the district court's orders We have

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we Belk v.

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Dickerhoff, No. 5:06-ct-03071-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 2006; Aug. 14, 2007). We grant Belk's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -