Alvin Smith v. Warden Steven Smith
Filing
920080213
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7366
ALVIN DARRELL SMITH, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN D. L. STINE, USP McCreary; WARDEN STEVEN SMITH, District of Columbia; JOHN R. SIMPSON, USDC - USDOJ, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (2:05-cv-00064-REM)
Submitted:
January 17, 2008
Decided:
February 13, 2008
Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alvin Darrell Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Alvin Darrell Smith, a District of Columbia prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court's order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless
a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right."
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).
A prisoner
satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). and conclude that We have independently reviewed the record has not made the requisite showing.
Smith
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. The court further grants the Respondent's motion to
substitute custodian and denies Smith's motions to stop transfer and directing Warden Stine to comply with his declaration. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?