US v. Wooten
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALONZO N. WOOTEN, a/k/a Cut Wooten, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (4:99-cr-00006-JBF)
January 17, 2008
January 28, 2008
Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alonzo N. Wooten, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Richard Murphy, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Alonzo N. Wooten appeals the district court's order denying his motion for specific performance of his plea agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Wooten, No. 4:99-cv-00006-JBF (E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?