US v. Charles
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROGER DALE CHARLES, II, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (2:04-cr-00027)
February 28, 2008
Decided: March 6, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roger Dale Charles, II, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Brian Howard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Roger Dale Charles, II, appeals the district court's order construing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition as a motion to compel his attorney to produce a full copy of the record and denying it. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the See United States v. Charles, No. 2:04-cr-00027 We dispense with oral argument because
(W.D.N.C. Sept. 7, 2007).
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?