US v. Conklin
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ERIC KAVE CONKLIN, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (1:03-cr-00096-jpj)
December 13, 2007
December 21, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric Kave Conklin, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis H. Lee, COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Tazewell, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Eric Kave Conklin appeals the district court's order denying his "Motion in Request of a Nunc Pro Tunc Order." reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have
Accordingly, we United
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
States v. Conklin, No. 1:03-cr-00096-jpj (W.D. Va. Sept. 20, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?