Carr v. Holt

Filing 920080306


Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7508 STEVEN D. CARR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RAY HOLT, Regional Director of Bureau of Prisons; HARRELL WATTS, Administrator; JOHN J. LAMANNA, Warden of FCI Edgefield; L. FUERTES ROSARIO, Health Services Administrator at FCI Edgefield; E. FAYTONG, Physicians Assistant; L. GUEVARH, Assistant Medical Services Administrator; A. SAHA, Physicians Assistant; J. LOPEZ, MLP at FCI Edgefield; R. BLOCKER, MLP at FCI Edgefield; J. SERRANE; A. WILLIAMS, X-Ray Technician; NFN TURNER, Food Service Administrator; A. STACKS, Assistant Food Service Administrator; NFN MAHONES, Unit Manager; NFN BOLTIN, Counselor; NFN VINNING, Lieutenant; NFN LOVEGROVE, Food Service Forman; THOMAS C. DAVIS, Food Service Supervisor at FCI Edgefield, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (6:06-cv-02333-TLW) Submitted: February 28, 2008 Decided: March 6, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven D. Carr, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Steven D. Carr appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 2007). Carr v. Holt, No. 6:06-cv-02333-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 25, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?