Wyatt v. Mahon

Filing 920080708

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7524 KEITH E. WYATT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DANIEL T. MAHON, Warden, HCC; FRED SCHILLING, Director of Health Services; DR. ROGER M. PHILLIPS, M.D., Prison Doctor, HRRJ; DR. JOHN KING, M.D., Prison Doctor, HCC; DOCTOR K. W. JARRETT, M.D., Prison Doctor, HCC; DOCTOR W. D. HENCEROTH, M.D., Prison Doctor, PCC; DOCTOR BENJAMIN ULEP, M.D., Prison Doctor, Sussex II State Prison, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:06-cv-00348-JBF) Submitted: June 17, 2008 Decided: July 8, 2008 Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith E. Wyatt, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Bland Curwood, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF Richmond, Virginia; Lisa Ehrich, Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Edward Joseph McNelis, III, Assistant VIRGINIA, & COWARD, Elizabeth Martin Muldowney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Keith E. Wyatt appeals the district court's order granting Defendants' motions for summary judgment and dismissing claims against Defendant King for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wyatt v. Mahon, No. 2:06-cv-00348-JBF (E.D. Va. Sept. 21, 2007). facts and legal before We dispense with oral argument because the are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the contentions the court materials would decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?