In Re: Feurtado
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
ANTHONY FEURTADO, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:96-cr-00325-SB; 3:03-cv-02949-SB)
February 28, 2008
March 7, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Feurtado, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Anthony Feurtado petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to reconsider the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) filed on August 2, 2006, and amended on August 14, 2006, and his motion to correct clerical error under Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. He seeks an
order from this court directing the district court to act. Because the district court has now ruled on both motions, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?