Rogers v. Bullock
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
CHARLES GENE ROGERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN T. BULLOCK; DON G. WOOD; BOYD BENNETT; KENWORTHY; MARY LU ROGERS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Paul Trevor Sharp, Magistrate Judge. (1:06-cv-00350-PTS)
May 13, 2008
June 2, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Gene Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Charles Gene Rogers appeals the order of the magistrate judge denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Rogers v. Bullock, No. 1:06-cv-00350-PTS (M.D.N.C.
Sept. 14, 2007).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?