US v. Mitchell
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. ARTHUR A. MITCHELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appellee,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (9:03-cr-00590-SB)
February 28, 2008
March 7, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur A. Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hayden Bickerton, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Arthur A. Mitchell appeals the district court's order denying his motions for preparation of a transcript at Government expense and an extension of time in which to file a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mitchell, No.
9:03-cr-00590-SB (D.S.C. filed Oct. 9, 2007 & entered Oct. 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?