Andre Woody v. State of North Carolina
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
ANDRE LAMAR WOODY, similarly situated,
Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; MIKE F. EASLEY; LEXIS PUBLISHING; NANCY S. NASH, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00032-D)
March 20, 2008
April 17, 2008
Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andre Lamar Woody, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Andre Lamar Woody appeals the district court's orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.* See Woody v. North Carolina, No. 2:07-cv-00032-D) (E.D.N.C Oct. 3 and Nov. 9, 2007). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
We also deny Woody's request for mandamus relief. 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?