Andre Woody v. State of North Carolina

Filing 920080417

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7693 ANDRE LAMAR WOODY, similarly situated, on behalf of himself and all others Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; MIKE F. EASLEY; LEXIS PUBLISHING; NANCY S. NASH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00032-D) Submitted: March 20, 2008 Decided: April 17, 2008 Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andre Lamar Woody, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Andre Lamar Woody appeals the district court's orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.* See Woody v. North Carolina, No. 2:07-cv-00032-D) (E.D.N.C Oct. 3 and Nov. 9, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED * We also deny Woody's request for mandamus relief. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?