Tommy Farrar v. Lt. Hodge
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
TOMMY FARRAR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LT. HODGE; OFFICER ELLIS; OFFICER CURTIS; LIEUTENANT ALFORD; LIEUTENANT MERIDITH; SERGEANT MCCORMICK; OFFICER DIPONTE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:06-ct-03079-D)
August 21, 2008
September 10, 2008
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN,* Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tommy Farrar, Appellant Pro Se. John A. Maxfield, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE COUNTY OF WAKE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Judge Duncan did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).
PER CURIAM: Tommy Farrar appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm Farrar v. Hodge, No.
for the reasons stated by the district court. 5:06-ct-03079-D (E.D.N.C. Nov. 27, 2007).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?