Thomas Soul v. Movado Retail Group, Incorpora

Filing 920081204


Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1072 THOMAS J. E. SOUL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MOVADO RETAIL GROUP, INCORPORATED; RICK ABOUL-HOSN; MAN CHOI; VICTORIA CUMUYANI, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:07-cv-00365-GBL-BRP) Submitted: October 23, 2008 Decided: December 4, 2008 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas J. E. Soul, Appellant Pro Se. Rafael E. Morell, Francina Segbefia, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Thomas J. E. Soul appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment on Soul's employment discrimination action. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons Soul v. Movado Retail Group, Inc., Moreover, we find the stated by the district court. No. 1:07-cv-00365-GBL-BRP (Nov. 8, 2007). district court neither abused its discretion in ordering Soul to pay Movado's attorneys' fees incurred in connection with Soul's failure to comply with discovery orders nor erred in declining to provide Soul with court-appointed counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?