Randy Thomas v. R. Fulton

Filing 920080722

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1111

RANDY L. THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. R. HARCOURT FULTON; JAMES HAMMOND, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 08-1292

RANDY L. THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. R. HARCOURT FULTON; JAMES HAMMOND, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 08-1325

RANDY L. THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v.

R. HARCOURT FULTON; JAMES HAMMOND, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00200-GCM)

Submitted:

June 26, 2008

Decided:

July 22, 2008

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randy L. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Sardar Mujeeb Shah-Khan, CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Charlotte, North Carolina; Mark Weston Johnson, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Randy L. Thomas appeals the district court's orders entered in his action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), which (1) granted the motions to dismiss filed by R. Harcourt Fulton and James Hammond (No. 08-1111); (2) denied Thomas' motions filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) (No. 08-1292); and (3) reimposed a prefiling injunction on remand (No. 08-1325). error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Thomas v. Fulton, No. 3:07-cv-00200-GCM (W.D.N.C. We dispense with oral

district court.

Dec. 11, 2007; Feb. 4, 2008; Feb. 13, 2008).

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

- 3 -