Kedir Mudessir v. Eric Holder, Jr.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
KEDIR ESSA MUDESSIR, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
February 25, 2009
March 10, 2009
Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mary Ann Berlin, Baltimore, Maryland, for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel E. Goldman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Mona Maria Yousif, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Kedir Essa Mudessir, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying his motion to reopen and reconsider. * Based on
our review of the record, we find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen as untimely. C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2008). claims that the time limitation 8
To the extent that Mudessir should have been equitably
tolled on the ground that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, we find this claim foreclosed in light of our recent decision in Afanwi v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 788, 796-99 (4th Cir. 2008) (holding that there is no constitutional right under the Fifth Amendment to effective assistance of counsel in removal proceedings). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We
also deny the pending motion for remand.
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
We decline to review the Board's denial of the motion to reconsider in light of Mudessir's failure to challenge the denial before this court. See Ngarurih v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 182, 189 n.7 (4th Cir. 2004).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?