Harold Hodge, Jr. v. Calvert County Public Schools

Filing 920081023


Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1256 HAROLD H. HODGE, JR., next of kin and friends of B.N.H. and B.S.H.; CHANTE' N. HODGE, next of kin or friends of B.N.H. and B.S.H., Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. CALVERT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; ROBERT L. GRAY, CCPS, Board Member President; ROBIN WELSH, CCPS, Assistant Superintendent; KIMBERLY H. ROOF, CCPS, Director of Student Services; KEVIN MICHAEL, CCPS, Director of Personnel and Employee Relations; WILLIAM J. PHALEN, Sr., CCPS, Board Member; SAINT LEONARD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL; DENNIS VOGEL, SLES, Vice Principal; MARJORIE REARDON, SLES, Schools' Registered Nurse; BEVERLY BUEHLER, SLES, Schools' Secretary; TONI CHAPMAN, SLES, Principal; SOUTHERN MIDDLE SCHOOL; KEVIN MCDOWELL, SMS Gym Teacher, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07cv-03207-RWT) Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 23, 2008 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harold H. Hodge, Jr., Chante'N. Hodge, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Harold Hodge, Jr. and Chante' N. Hodge, individually and as parents of B.N.H. and B.S.H., appeal the district court's order dismissing their civil and action medical alleging discrimination, We have constitutional violations, malpractice. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm for the reasons stated by the Accordingly, court. district Hodge v. Calvert County Public Schools, et al., No. 8:07-cv03207-RWT (D. Md. Feb. 1, 2008). amend the informal brief. We We also deny the motion to dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?