Kathryn Duvall v. Honeywell Technology Solutions
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
KATHRYN DUVALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HONEYWELL TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation; HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (2:06-cv-03544-CWH)
June 19, 2008
June 23, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kathryn Duvall, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret League Boylston, PETERS, MURDAUGH, PARKER, ELTZROTH & DETRICK, PA, Hampton, South Carolina, Benjamin Phillip Glass, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Kathryn Duvall appeals the district court's order
granting Defendant's summary judgment motion on her defamation claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Duvall v.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order.*
Honeywell Tech. Solutions, Inc., No. 2:06-cv-03544-CWH (D.S.C. filed Feb. 6, 2008; entered Feb. 8, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Although Duvall summarily requests an order redacting all of her personal information and work history from the court's records, as well as an order sealing the court's records, because she has not established she is entitled to this relief, we deny Duvall's requests. - 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?