William Bond v. United States Attorney

Filing 920080912

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1320

WILLIAM C. BOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, District of Maryland, Northern Division; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, for the District of Maryland, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:07-cv-01188-WDQ)

Submitted:

August 28, 2008

Decided:

September 12, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William C. Bond, Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: William C. Bond appeals from the district court's orders dismissing his action seeking relief under the Freedom of We

Information Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 552 (West 2007 & Supp. 2008). have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.*

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bond v. United States Attorney, No. 1:07-cv-01188-WDQ Additionally, we deny all of

(D. Md. May 17 & Nov. 20, 2007).

Bond's pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the

materials

would

decisional process. AFFIRMED

Bond also appeals from the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration, motion to recuse, and motion for leave to file an amended complaint. Upon review of the record, we find the district court did not err in denying Bond's motions. 2

*