Sydney Sutton v. North Carolina Department of L

Filing 920081104


Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1380 SYDNEY CHERYL SUTTON, Plaintiff Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Defendant Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:06-cv-00308-FL) Submitted: October 22, 2008 Decided: November 4, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles E. Monteith, Jr., Shelli H. Rice, MONTEITH & RICE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Roy Cooper, Attorney General for North Carolina, Victoria L. Voight, Special Deputy Attorney General, Sonya Calloway-Durham, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Sydney order granting Cheryl Defendant Sutton appeals the on district her court's summary judgment retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000), and the North Carolina Whistleblower Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. 126-85 (2005). error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the See Sutton v. North Carolina Dep't of Labor, (E.D.N.C. filed Feb. 28, 2008; entered district court. No. 5:06-cv-00308-FL March 3, 2008). facts and legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials would decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?