Sydney Sutton v. North Carolina Department of L

Filing 920081104

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1380

SYDNEY CHERYL SUTTON, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Defendant ­ Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:06-cv-00308-FL)

Submitted:

October 22, 2008

Decided:

November 4, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles E. Monteith, Jr., Shelli H. Rice, MONTEITH & RICE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Roy Cooper, Attorney General for North Carolina, Victoria L. Voight, Special Deputy Attorney General, Sonya Calloway-Durham, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Sydney order granting Cheryl Defendant Sutton appeals the on district her court's

summary

judgment

retaliation

claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000), and the North Carolina Whistleblower Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 126-85

(2005). error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the See Sutton v. North Carolina Dep't of Labor, (E.D.N.C. filed Feb. 28, 2008; entered

district court. No.

5:06-cv-00308-FL

March 3, 2008). facts and legal before

We dispense with oral argument because the contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the

materials

would

decisional process. AFFIRMED

2