Timothy Martin v. Scott & Stringfellow
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
TIMOTHY R. MARTIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SCOTT & STRINGFELLOW, INC., Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00207-HEH)
September 16, 2008
October 6, 2008
Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy R. Martin, Appellant Pro Se. David Edward Constine, III, TROUTMAN & SANDERS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Timothy R. Martin appeals the district court's order denying his motion to vacate the arbitration award granted to Scott & Stringfellow, Inc. reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, although we grant Martin's motion
to supplement his reply brief, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Scott & Stringfellow, Inc., No.
3:06-cv-00207-HEH (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 13, entered Mar. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?