Timothy Martin v. Scott & Stringfellow

Filing 920081006

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1435

TIMOTHY R. MARTIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SCOTT & STRINGFELLOW, INC., Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00207-HEH)

Submitted:

September 16, 2008

Decided:

October 6, 2008

Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy R. Martin, Appellant Pro Se. David Edward Constine, III, TROUTMAN & SANDERS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Timothy R. Martin appeals the district court's order denying his motion to vacate the arbitration award granted to Scott & Stringfellow, Inc. reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no

Accordingly, although we grant Martin's motion

to supplement his reply brief, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Scott & Stringfellow, Inc., No.

3:06-cv-00207-HEH (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 13, entered Mar. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2