UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
MARK ANTHONY REYNOLDS, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 5:04-cr-00088-2; 5:07-cv-00271)
June 26, 2008
July 1, 2008
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark Anthony Reynolds, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Mark Anthony Reynolds petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and his motion for bail. He
seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The district court has denied the bail motion, and we find there has been no undue delay in the district court with regard to the § 2255 motion. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in We dispense with contentions are
forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. oral argument because the facts and legal
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?