Robert Johnson v. Nubian Princess ENT

Filing 920090121

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1709 ROBERT L. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NUBIAN PRINCESS ENT, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:07-cv-01625-TLW) Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 21, 2009 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert L. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert L. Johnson seeks to appeal the district court's order accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissing his civil complaint. of jurisdiction because the We dismiss the appeal for lack of appeal was not timely notice filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). is "mandatory and jurisdictional." Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) This appeal period Browder v. Dir., Dep't of (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court's order was entered on the docket on July 31, 2007. The notice of appeal was filed at the earliest on June 13, 2008. Because Johnson failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. oral argument because in the the facts and legal before We dispense with contentions the court are and adequately presented materials argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?