Mary Stephens-Frazier v. National Institute of Health

Filing 920091005

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1741 MARY J. STEPHENS-FRAZIER, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH, Defendant ­ Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:07-cv-00435-JFM) Submitted: September 3, 2009 Decided: October 5, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sherrie T. Howell, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Melanie L. Glickson, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dr. Mary J. Stephens-Frazier appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment on her race discrimination, hostile work environment harassment and retaliation claims, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006), and state law claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, and its order denying her We Fed. have R. Civ. P. the 59(e) record motion and find for no reconsideration. reversible error. orders. reviewed Accordingly, we affirm the district court's See Stephens-Frazier v. National Inst. of Health, No. 1:07-cv-00435-JFM (D. Md. filed May 19, 2008, entered May 20, 2008; May 30, 2008). facts and legal before We dispense with oral argument because the are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the contentions the court materials would decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?