Mary Stephens-Frazier v. National Institute of Health
Filing
920091005
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1741
MARY J. STEPHENS-FRAZIER, Plaintiff Appellant, v. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH, Defendant Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:07-cv-00435-JFM)
Submitted:
September 3, 2009
Decided:
October 5, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sherrie T. Howell, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Melanie L. Glickson, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Dr. Mary J. Stephens-Frazier appeals the district
court's order granting Defendant's motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment on her race discrimination, hostile work environment harassment and retaliation claims, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006), and state law claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, and its order denying her We Fed. have R. Civ. P. the 59(e) record motion and find for no
reconsideration. reversible error. orders.
reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm the district court's
See Stephens-Frazier v. National Inst. of Health, No.
1:07-cv-00435-JFM (D. Md. filed May 19, 2008, entered May 20, 2008; May 30, 2008). facts and legal before We dispense with oral argument because the are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the
contentions the court
materials
would
decisional process. AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?