Larry Miller v. Jean Cunningham

Filing 920090318

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1742 LARRY MILLER; COMMITTEE, 11TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT REPUBLICAN Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. JEAN CUNNINGHAM, in her official capacity as Chairman of the Virginia State Board of Elections; HAROLD PYON, in his official capacity as Vice-Chairman of the Virginia State Board of Elections; NANCY RODRIQUES, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Virginia State Board of Elections, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:05-cv-00266-HEH) Submitted: February 23, 2009 Decided: March 18, 2009 Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patrick M. McSweeney, Wesley G. Russell, Jr., MCSWEENEY, CRUMP, CHILDRESS & TEMPLE, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Paul A. Prados, CUCCINELLI & DAY, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellants. Robert F. McDonnell, Attorney General, Stephen R. McCullough, State Solicitor General, James V. Ingold, Senior Assistant Attorney General, William C. Mims, Chief Deputy Attorney General, William E. Thro, Special Counsel to the Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Larry Miller and the 11th Senatorial District Republican Committee appeal the district court's order denying their 42 U.S.C. 1988(b) (2000) motion for attorneys' fees. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Miller v Cunningham, No. 3:05-cv-00266-HEH (E.D. Va. We dispense with oral argument because the contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the June 27, 2008). facts and legal before materials would decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?