Stephen Carden v. Michael Astrue

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:07-cv-00025. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998451098] [08-1795]

Download PDF
Stephen Carden v. Michael Astrue Doc. 0 Case: 08-1795 Document: 39 Date Filed: 10/22/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1795 STEPHEN ANDREW CARDEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Mary E. Stanley, Magistrate Judge. (2:07-cv-00025) Submitted: September 23, 2010 Decided: October 22, 2010 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Greg R. Lord, THE LORD LAW FIRM, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Eric P. Kressman, Regional Chief Counsel, Edward C. Tompsett, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Nora Koch, Deputy Regional Chief Counsel, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Charles T. Miller, United States Attorney, Carol A. Casto, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 08-1795 Document: 39 Date Filed: 10/22/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Stephen Andrew Carden appeals the magistrate judge's * order affirming the Commissioner's decision denying Carden's application for supplemental security income. the record and find no reversible error. for the reasons No. stated by the (S.D. We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm judge. 28, facts Carden 2008). and v. We legal magistrate W. Va. Astrue, dispense 2:07-cv-00025 oral Mar. the with argument because contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED This case was decided by a magistrate judge with the parties' consent pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006). 2 *

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?