Earl Richardson v. The Great State of Maryland

Filing 920081114

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1802

EARL L. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE GREAT STATE OF MARYLAND; CECIL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICE; NICHOLAS RICCIUTI, Director of Cecil County Department of Social Services; WILLIAMS JONES, Employee of Department of Social Services; SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; MRS. GULOTTI, Elkton Maryland Branch; MRS. DAVIDS, Elkton Maryland Branch; THE GREAT STATE OF WASHINGTON; CLALLAM COUNTY WASHINGTON; JIM JONES, Administrator; LINDA CLEVENGER, Administrator; DEPARTMENT OF PAROLE AND PROBATION, Defendants ­ Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01087-CCB)

Submitted:

October 27, 2008

Decided:

November 14, 2008

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Earl L. Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Julia Doyle Bernhardt, Assistant Attorney General, William Ferris Brockman, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Mark C. Jobson, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON, Olympia,

Washington; Kelly Hughes Iverson, GOODELL, DEVRIES, DANN, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

LEECH

&

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM: Earl L. Richardson appeals the district court's order dismissing this action complaining about the termination of

social security benefits. no reversible error.

We have reviewed the record and find

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons Richardson v. The Great State of (D. Md. July the 2, 2008). and We legal

stated by the district court. Maryland, dispense No. with

1:08-cv-01087-CCB oral argument

because

facts

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

3