Randy Thomas v. Ynez Olshausen
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
RANDY L. THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. YNEZ OLSHAUSEN; MARY ELLEN MCDONALD; PETER GORMAN; CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG POLICE; CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00130-GCM)
February 11, 2009
March 12, 2009
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randy L. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel William Clark, THARRINGTON, SMITH, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Richard Harcourt Fulton, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina; Thomas J. Ziko, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Randy L. Thomas appeals the district court's order
denying his motions for recusal, for a more definite statement, and for discovery in his action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). discretion. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by Thomas v. Olshausen, No. 3:07-cv-00130-GCM We deny Thomas' motion for emergency
the district court.
(W.D.N.C. June 16, 2008). relief. legal before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional
contentions the court
The district court dismissed the action, and we affirmed. Thomas v. Olshausen, __ F. App'x __, 2008 WL 5181833 (4th Cir. Dec. 11, 2008) (No. 08-1769).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?